| You're viewing Create a Dreamwidth Account Learn More | Reload page in style: site light |
The Perennial Transgender Toilet Debate : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15 |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
(no subject)
it's nice that people are so concerned to protect (cis) women from sexual assault, but there are numerous gaping holes in this idea, some of the most obvious being: women are already sexually assaulted in public toilets from time to time by (cis) men who are obviously not put off by the unwritten rules about women's space; I'm not aware of any evidence so far that gender-neutral toilets offer increased risk of sexual assault; women are already being told, endlessly, about places to avoid if they don't want to be raped, and yet many of them unfortunately still are, so why are public toilets more dangerous than many other places women regularly go? Not to mention, of course, that a high number of assaults are not committed by total strangers.
None of which seems to go anywhere near addressing the cissexism (I think you've got that down already), but it does seem to me that even if the intention is to protect the fragile honour of cis women, this response still fails to be logical. Trans people really are the last people I worry about my safety around, tbh.
Hmm